The Lawsuit

November 14, 2011

October 24, 2011

October 17, 2011

September 28, 2011

September 28, 2011

September 28, 2011

September 28, 2011

September 28, 2011

September 28, 2011

September 28, 2011

August 12, 2011

May 24, 2011

May 18, 2011

May 4, 2011

May 4, 2011

April 1, 2011

March 31, 2011

March 10, 2011

March 10, 2011

March 3, 2011

February 28, 2011

February 23, 2011

January 31, 2011

January 19, 2011

January 18, 2011

January 18, 2011

December 7, 2010

December 6, 2010

November 23, 2010

November 23, 2010

November 4 , 2010

November 4, 2010

October 14, 2010

September 15, 2010

August 27, 2010

August 6, 2010

June 16, 2010

May 28, 2010

May 25, 2010

May 14, 2010

April 14, 2010

March 23, 2010


 
Search: This Site Web 

Immediately after the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed into law on March 23, 2010, 13 Attorneys General filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Treasury and the U.S. Department of Labor alleging the Health Care Reform law signed by the President was unconstitutional.

The amended complaint currently features 26 state plaintiffs; additionally, the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) joined the lawsuit as a co-plaintiff on behalf of its members nationwide.

The lawsuit, filed in the federal court’s Northern District of Florida on March 23, alleges the new law infringes upon the constitutional rights of Floridians and residents of the other states by mandating all citizens and legal residents have qualifying health care coverage or pay a tax penalty. By imposing such a mandate, the law exceeds the powers of the United States under Article I of the Constitution. Additionally, the tax penalty required under the law constitutes an unlawful direct tax in violation of Article I, sections 2 and 9 of the Constitution.

The lawsuit further claims the health care reform law infringes on the sovereignty of the states and Tenth Amendment to the Constitution by imposing onerous new operating rules that Florida must follow as well as requiring the state to spend billions of additional dollars without providing funds or resources to meet the state's cost of implementing the law. This burden comes at a time when Florida faces severe budget cuts to offset shortfalls in an already-strained budget.

Plaintiffs
Florida
South Carolina
Nebraska
Texas
Utah
Louisiana
Alabama
Colorado
Michigan
Pennsylvania
Washington
Idaho
South Dakota
Indiana
Mississippi
Nevada
Arizona
Georgia
Alaska
NFIB
North Dakota
Wisconsin
Iowa
Ohio
Kansas
Wyoming
Maine